SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD
1 references·3 citing·17 second hop
THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD (2011)THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL O…TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be "Experts," But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions (2005)TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED TH…Promoting Coparenting After Divorce: A Relational Perspective on Child Custody Evaluations in Italy (2016)Promoting Coparenting After D…The Ecological Validity of Parent-Child Observations: A Review of Empirical Evidence Related to Custody Evaluations (2014)The Ecological Validity of Pa…De la mère « normale ». Normes, expertises et justice en protection de la jeunesse (2014)De la mère « normale ». Norme…Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Coercive Family Process (1982)Coercive family process (1983)Testing in child custody evaluations: An overview of issues and uses (2017)Centre-based supervised child-parent contact in Ireland: The views and experiences of fathers, supervisors and key stakeholders (2019)International perspective on guidelines and policies for child custody and child maltreatment risk evaluations: A preliminary comparative analysis across selected countries in Europe and North America (2022)Stigmate : les usages sociaux des handicaps (1975)Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments (1988)La condition postmoderne (2017)Différenciation et hybridation dans les logiques de protection des mineur·es au civil et au pénal (2022)Beyond the Best Interests of the Child (1974)Children's Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives (2003)Advances in Psychology Research (2008)Efficacy of Co-Parenting for Successful Kids: A Longitudinal Pilot Investigation (2019)RELOCATION, RESEARCH, AND FORENSIC EVALUATION: PART II: RESEARCH IN SUPPORT OF THE RELOCATION RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL (2008)Attachment Methodology in Custody Evaluation: Four Hurdles Standing Between Developmental Theory and Forensic Application (2009)THE EMERGING FORENSIC ROLE FOR WORK PRODUCT REVIEW AND CASE ANALYSIS IN CHILD ACCESS AND PARENTING PLAN DISPUTES (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be "Experts," But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions23 cited

Cited by

  • 2014The Ecological Validity of Parent-Child Observations: A Review of Empirical Evidence Related to Custody Evaluations15 cited
  • 2014De la mère « normale ». Normes, expertises et justice en protection de la jeunesse12 cited
  • 2016Promoting Coparenting After Divorce: A Relational Perspective on Child Custody Evaluations in Italy12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work