Essential elements of questionnaire design and development

2007-01-11reviewJournal of Clinical Nursing1,486 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Health Education and Validation Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this paper were (1) to raise awareness of the issues in questionnaire development and subsequent psychometric evaluation, and (2) to provide strategies to enable nurse researchers to design and develop their own measure and evaluate the quality of existing nursing measures. BACKGROUND: The number of questionnaires developed by nurses has increased in recent years. While the rigour applied to the questionnaire development process may be improving, we know that nurses are still not generally adept at the psychometric evaluation of new measures. This paper explores the process by which a reliable and valid questionnaire can be developed. METHODS: We critically evaluate the theoretical and methodological issues associated with questionnaire design and development and present a series of heuristic decision-making strategies at each stage of such development. The range of available scales is presented and we discuss strategies to enable item generation and development. The importance of stating a priori the number of factors expected in a prototypic measure is emphasized. Issues of reliability and validity are explored using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and illustrated using examples from recent nursing research literature. CONCLUSION: Questionnaire design and development must be supported by a logical, systematic and structured approach. To aid this process we present a framework that supports this and suggest strategies to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the new and developing measure. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In developing the evidence base of nursing practice using this method of data collection, it is vital that questionnaire design incorporates preplanned methods to establish reliability and validity. Failure to develop a questionnaire sufficiently may lead to difficulty interpreting results, and this may impact upon clinical or educational practice. This paper presents a critical evaluation of the questionnaire design and development process and demonstrates good practice at each stage of this process.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,486 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

1992The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

1960A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

1988A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire

1993The handbook of psychological testing

2014An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis

1994An easy guide to factor analysis

1992THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION

Cited by

2015Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication

2015Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde

2018Construction and validation of an Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health

2015A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace

2014Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment

2015The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment

2017