SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology
14 references·6 citing·43 second hop
Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology (2014)Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor i…Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals (2013)Publication Times, Impact Fac…Does Open Access in Ophthalmology Affect How Articles Are Subsequently Cited in Research? (2009)Does Open Access in Ophthalmo…Negative Results and Impact Factor (2005)Negative Results and Impact F…Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? (2005)Impact factors and their sign…The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor (2004)The level of non-citation of …Impact of FUTON and NAA Bias on Visibility of Research (2004)Impact of FUTON and NAA Bias …Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality (2003)Counting on citations: a flaw…Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting (2002)Publication bias in gastroent…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals (1995)Impact factor as a misleading…Measure for Measure in Science (1993)Measure for Measure in SciencePublication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis (1987)Confronting publication bias:…The effect of mere presence of smartphone on cognitive functions: A four-level meta-analysis. (2024)The effect of mere presence o…Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings (2023)Promotion and caution in rese…POSITIVE RESULTS BIAS AND IMPACT FACTOR IN RETINA CLINICAL TRIALS 2016 to 2019 (2021)POSITIVE RESULTS BIAS AND IMP…The fate of abstracts presented at international ophthalmology meetings: 2- and 5-year publication rates (2018)The fate of abstracts present…Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance (2018)Publication bias and the chas…Positive results bias in pediatric ophthalmology scientific publications (2018)Positive results bias in pedi…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000–2004 (2005)Frequency and Determinants of Nonpublication of Research in the Stroke Literature (2006)Publication Rates for Abstracts Presented by Korean Investigators at Major Radiology Meetings (2008)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The skewness of science (1992)Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? (1996)Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact (1999)What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality (2002)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2014)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals (2016)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Ranking, rating and scoring of tourism journals: Interdisciplinary challenges and innovations (2007)The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics? (2010)Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors (2013)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Efficacy of Drug Treatment in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: a Meta-Analytic Review (1995)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Problems and Limitations in Conducting Systematic Reviews (2001)The counting house (2002)Relation between online “hit counts” and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ (2004)Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views (2007)Age effects in scientific productivity (2003)Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? (2003)Articles by Latin American Authors in Prestigious Journals Have Fewer Citations (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 1987Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis216 cited
  • 2003Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality166 cited
  • 2004The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor157 cited
  • 1993Measure for Measure in Science125 cited
  • 1995Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals119 cited
  • 2002Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting103 cited
  • 2005Negative Results and Impact Factor85 cited
  • 2013Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals83 cited
  • 2004Impact of FUTON and NAA Bias on Visibility of Research63 cited
  • 2009Does Open Access in Ophthalmology Affect How Articles Are Subsequently Cited in Research?62 cited
  • 2005Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused?51 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2024The effect of mere presence of smartphone on cognitive functions: A four-level meta-analysis.14 cited
  • 2018Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance14 cited
  • 2023Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings14 cited
  • 2018The fate of abstracts presented at international ophthalmology meetings: 2- and 5-year publication rates13 cited
  • 2018Positive results bias in pediatric ophthalmology scientific publications9 cited
  • 2021POSITIVE RESULTS BIAS AND IMPACT FACTOR IN RETINA CLINICAL TRIALS 2016 to 20197 cited