Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "NO"

Abstract

This paper argues against the suggestion that governments should push for gender equality more aggressively in order to raise fertility.The paper presents a threefold "no" to this proposal.It takes issue with the goal of raising fertility, arguing that the claims that fertility must be increased are based on myths.It rejects a more aggressive pursuit of gender equality for demographic purposes, maintaining that this method preserves inequality.It warns against using gender equality for fertility purposes, stating that this narrows the realm of gender equality.The paper is based on a debate held at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, at which the author was asked to argue against the gender equality-fertility proposal.The other participants in the debate were Laurent Toulemon ("yes"), Dimiter Philipov ("no"), and Livia Oláh ("yes"). 1 This is the second of two "no" positions taken from the "Rostock Debate on Demographic Change" held at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research on 21 February 2006.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.