SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials
8 references·16 citing·40 second hop
A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1994)A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Ra…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Rand…The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)The Cochrane Collaboration: P…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (1989)Methodology and overt and hid…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales: A …Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Measuring Health: A Guide to …Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Reporting on Methods in Clini…CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 explanation and …Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results (2018)Why all randomised controlled…A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network (2016)A history of the evolution of…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting (2012)Publication of Tumor Marker R…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Depressive symptoms among mothers of children with epilepsy: A review of prevalence, associated factors, and impact on children (2009)Depressive symptoms among mot…Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement (2006)Reporting in randomized clini…The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews (2001)The art of quality assessment…CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the…Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. (2001)Action research: a systematic…Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Improving the Quality of Repo…Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Reporting of Adverse Effects …CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to …Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials (1996)Guidelines for reporting resu…Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology: Table 1 (1996)Blinding and exclusions after…Truth and Method (1960)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Action research: politics, ethics and participation (2002)Cost-effectiveness of preventing depression in primary care patients (2006)From Mirroring to World‐Making: Research as Future Forming (2014)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Design of Experiments (1936)Treatment Research at the Crossroads: The Scientific Interface of Clinical Trials and Effectiveness Research (1999)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. (1886)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews (1996)Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)Declaración de la iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales (2008)Brief mindfulness training for negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2018)Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. (1992)The PHQ-9 (2001)The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure (2002)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use9,594 cited
  • 1987Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires4,207 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
  • 1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
  • 1989Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis338 cited

Cited by

  • 2001Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment.407 cited
  • 2001CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials294 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version)248 cited
  • 2001The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews245 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1998
CONSORT: An Evolving Tool to Help Improve the Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials
241 cited
  • 2000Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement235 cited
  • 2006Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement227 cited
  • 2009Depressive symptoms among mothers of children with epilepsy: A review of prevalence, associated factors, and impact on children222 cited
  • 2025CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials203 cited
  • 2012Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting185 cited
  • 2016A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network174 cited
  • 2018Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results174 cited
  • 1999Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved167 cited
  • 1996Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials167 cited
  • 1996Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology: Table 1161 cited