SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why the dalton should be redefined exactly in terms of the kilogram
4 references·3 citing·24 second hop
Why the dalton should be redefined exactly in terms of the kilogram (2012)Why the dalton should be redefined exactl…Comments on recent proposals for redefining the mole and kilogram (2010)Comments on recent proposals …Molar mass and related quantities in the New SI (2009)Molar mass and related quanti…Amount of substance and the proposed redefinition of the mole (2009)Amount of substance and the p…Redefinition of the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and mole: a proposed approach to implementing CIPM recommendation 1 (CI-2005) (2006)Redefinition of the kilogram,…Comment on ‘Dimensionless units in the SI’ (2015)Comment on ‘Dimensionless uni…The mole is an Avogadro number of entities, the macroscopic unit for chemical amount (2014)The mole is an Avogadro numbe…Is there an objective need for an urgent redefinition of the kilogram and mole? (2013)Is there an objective need fo…Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report) (2003)Atomic weights of the elements 2005 (IUPAC Technical Report) (2006)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006 (2008)The next 50 years of the SI: a review of the opportunities for the e-Science age (2010)A new definition for the mole based on the Avogadro constant: a journey from physics to chemistry (2011)A critical review of the proposed definitions of fundamental chemical quantities and their impact on chemical communities (IUPAC Technical Report) (2017)Redefinition of the kilogram: a decision whose time has come (2005)History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant (2012)A skeptic’s review of the New SI (2010)The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way To Understanding (2011)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010 (2012)Angles—Let’s treat them squarely (1997)Reply to Comments on ‘Dimensionless units in the SI’ (2015)What’s in a Name? Amount of Substance, Chemical Amount, and Stoichiometric Amount (2016)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998 (2000)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002 (2005)Determination of the Avogadro Constant by Counting the Atoms in a Si28 Crystal (2011)The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell (2011)Watt balance experiments for the determination of the Planck constant and the redefinition of the kilogram (2012)The revision of the SI—the result of three decades of progress in metrology (2019)Guide for the use of the International System of Units (SI) (2008)Dimensionless units in the SI (2014)Proposal for the dimensionally consistent treatment of angle and solid angle by the International System of Units (SI) (2021)On the dimension of angles and their units (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Redefinition of the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and mole: a proposed approach to implementing CIPM recommendation 1 (CI-2005)378 cited
  • 2009Amount of substance and the proposed redefinition of the mole41 cited
  • 2009Molar mass and related quantities in the New SI36 cited
  • 2010Comments on recent proposals for redefining the mole and kilogram25 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Comment on ‘Dimensionless units in the SI’14 cited
  • 2014The mole is an Avogadro number of entities, the macroscopic unit for chemical amount13 cited
  • 2013Is there an objective need for an urgent redefinition of the kilogram and mole?8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work