SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness
11 references·5 citing·35 second hop
Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness (2005)Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Eva…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Evidence Of Evidence-Based Health Policy: The Politics Of Systematic Reviews In Coverage Decisions (2005)Evidence Of Evidence-Based He…Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Publication bias in situ (2004)Publication bias in situCombination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…An Introduction to a Bayesian Method for Meta-analysis (1990)An Introduction to a Bayesian…AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program (2009)AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identify…Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reports (2008)Assessment of adverse effects…Tracking the Growth of Drug Therapy Literature Using PubMed (2007)Tracking the Growth of Drug T…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…A Guide to This Supplement (2005)A Guide to This SupplementA method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations (2003)Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. (1993)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,556 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms147 cited
  • 2005Evidence Of Evidence-Based Health Policy: The Politics Of Systematic Reviews In Coverage Decisions124 cited
  • 2004Publication bias in situ94 cited
  • 1990An Introduction to a Bayesian Method for Meta-analysis85 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2009AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program107 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Assessment of adverse effects and applicability – two areas not (yet) covered adequately in Cochrane reports
19 cited
  • 2007Tracking the Growth of Drug Therapy Literature Using PubMed7 cited
  • 2005A Guide to This Supplement5 cited