Risk Factors and Sexual Assault Prevention

Abstract

Sexual assault prevention programming remains a confused, scattered, and sporadic enterprise with little scientific underpinning. This situation reflects general American policy biases against sexuality-related interventions and against “merely preventive” programs. More distinctively, sexual assault prevention suffers because it fully fits neither the traditional crime-prevention model nor the traditional public-health model of prevention programming. Technical and political consequences of this fundamental ambiguity are traced, and some consideration is given to a transcendental alternative model.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.