References

• 1997On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance17,267 cited
• 1973Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests14,248 cited
• 1976Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.13,381 cited
• 2003Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns5,362 cited
• 1997Formal and Real Authority in Organizations3,119 cited
• 2005Asset pricing with liquidity risk2,816 cited
• 2002Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus Hierarchical Firms2,426 cited
• 1970Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model2,282 cited
• 1988Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance2,253 cited
• 1996Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds2,093 cited
• 2004Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets2,082 cited
• 1995Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 19911,745 cited
• 2009How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance1,660 cited
• 2004Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization1,429 cited
• 1998Alternative factor specifications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns1We are especially grateful to Eugene Fama (a referee), an anonymous referee and Bill Schwert (the editor) for insightful and constructive suggestions. We also thank Wayne Ferson, Ken French, Will Goetzmann, Craig Holden, Ravi Jagannathan, Bob Jennings, Bruce Lehmann, Josef Lakonishok, Richard Roll, participants at the 1997 Meetings of the Western Finance Association, the 1997 UCLA/USC/UC Irvine conference, the November 1997 Asset Pricing Meeting of the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Atlanta Forum, and seminars at Columbia, Indiana, Florida, New York, Tulane, and Yale Universities; Eugene Fama and Ken French for providing part of the data used in this study; and Christoph Schenzler for excellent programming assistance. The second author acknowledges support from the Dean's Fund for Research and the Financial Markets Research Center at Vanderbilt University. We are responsible for remaining errors. This paper was formerly titled `A Re-Examination of Security Return Anomalies'.1