THE HELPING HAND OF THE LAW: POLICE CONTROL OF CITIZENS ON REQUEST*

Stephen D. Mastrofski · Jeffrey B. Snipes · Roger B. Parks · Christopher D. Maxwell

123 citations0/0 files storedCriminology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Policing Practices and Perceptions Criminal Justice and Penology Crime Patterns and Interventions

Abstract

This study examines how patrol officers respond to citizens' requests that officers control another citizen—by advising or persuading them, warning or threatening them, making them leave someone alone or leave the scene, or arresting them. Data are drawn from field observations conducted in Indianapolis, Indiana, in 1996 and St. Petersburg, Florida, in 1997. Officers granted the request for the most restrictive form of control requested by the citizen in 70% of the 396 observed cases. Several factors were modeled to determine their influence on officers' decisions to grant or deny the most restrictive request. These factors include legal considerations, need, factors that attenuate the impact of law or need, the social relationship between the requester and target of control, and personal characteristics of the officer. Multivariate analysis shows that the most influential factors were legal considerations. When citizens requested an arrest, the likelihood that the police would be responsive dropped considerably. However, as the evidence of a legal violation against the targeted citizen increased, so did the odds of an arrest. Officers were less likely to grant the requests of citizens having a close relationship with the person targeted for control, disrespectful of the police, or intoxicated or mentally ill. The race, wealth, and organization affiliation of citizen adversaries had little impact on the police decision. Male officers, officers with fewer years of police experience, and officers with a stronger proclivity to community policing, had significantly greater odds of giving citizens what they requested. The implications of the findings for research and policy are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 123 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy 1983In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.1968Varieties of Police Behavior 1972The Functions of the Police in Modern Society.1989Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil 1994Violence, aggression, and coercive actions.1997NEGOTIATING ORDER IN PATROL WORK: AN ECOLOGICAL THEORY OF POLICE RESPONSE TO DEVIANCE*1972Sociological Methodology, 1969

Cited by

2007DIRECTLY INTERVENE OR CALL THE AUTHORITIES? A STUDY OF FORMS OF NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIAL CONTROL WITHIN A SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION FRAMEWORK*2006Decision Making in Traffic Stop Encounters: A Multivariate Analysis of Police Behavior 2001Supervisory styles of patrol sergeants and lieutenants 2015Predicting Procedural Justice in Police–Citizen Encounters 2004Judging Police Misconduct: “Street-Level” versus Professional Policing 2004

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.