SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleNormalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment

Robin Haunschild2015

OA

Articlegreen2015

Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment

Robin Haunschild · Lutz Bornmann

60 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Library Science and Information Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management 1992The skewness of science 2014Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics 2010Altmetrics: A manifesto 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation 2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations

Cited by

2018Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed n.d.Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation 2017Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications 2016A data analytic approach to quantifying scientific impact 2016How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index 2018The life cycle of altmetric impact: A longitudinal study of six metrics from PlumX 2017Context of altmetrics data matters: an investigation of count type and user category 2020Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-12-18

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations60

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.003

openalex_workW2142998074

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.