Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

12 references·1 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017The Discovery of Grounded Theory25,772 cited
2017The Discovery of Grounded Theory8,346 cited
1997Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction6,866 cited
2000Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique5,943 cited
1981The measurement of interrater agreement874 cited
1986A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies763 cited
2001Consensus methods in prescribing research241 cited
2002Listening to respondents:197 cited
1997Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: A comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel134 cited
1999The Effect of Panel Membership and Feedback on Ratings in a Two-Round Delphi Survey132 cited
2002Users' Voices: the Perspective of Mental Health service users on Community and Hospital Care By Diana Rose. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. 2001. 120 pp.121 cited
2000Systematic review of the effect of on-site mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners56 cited

Cited by

2013Assessing Delphi panel composition for strategic foresight — A comparison of panels based on company-internal and external participants104 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work