SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia
5 references·6 citing·35 second hop
Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthesia (2015)Reviews, systematic reviews and Anaesthes…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Demystifying trial networks a…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasTwelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review (2018)Twelve tips for medical stude…Heterogeneity in meta‐analyses. Comparing apples and oranges? (2017)Heterogeneity in meta‐analyse…Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta‐epidemiological study (2016)Risk of bias and methodologic…Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted? (2016)Can systematic reviews with s…Trials and tribulations of a meta‐analyst (2015)Trials and tribulations of a …Funnels for publication bias – have we lost the plot? (2015)Funnels for publication bias …Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses (2017)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Examining and Interpreting Doi Plot Asymmetry in Meta‐Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder (2017)Methodologies for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in pain, anaesthesia, and perioperative medicine (2021)The global prevalence of depression and anxiety among doctors during the covid-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)How to perform and write a trial sequential analysis (2022)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision Models (2005)Number of studies, heterogeneity, generalisability, and the choice of method for meta-analysis (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic Reviews in Medical Education (2022)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2013Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis742 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?56 cited
  • 2017Heterogeneity in meta‐analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?52 cited
  • 2016Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta‐epidemiological study40 cited
  • 2015Funnels for publication bias – have we lost the plot?37 cited
  • 2018Twelve tips for medical students to conduct a systematic review20 cited
  • 2015Trials and tribulations of a meta‐analyst14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work