FISCAL DEFICITS AND MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

William Russell Easterly · Klaus Schmidt‐Hebbel

132 citations0/0 files storedThe World Bank Research Observer

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Fiscal Policies and Political Economy Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth

Abstract

Although fiscal adjustment was urged on developing countries during the 1980s to lead them out of economic malaise, considerable uncertainty remains about the relations between fiscal policy and macroeconomic performance. To illustrate how financial markets, private spending, and the external sector react to fiscal policies, the behavior of holdings of money and public debt, private consumption and investment, the trade balance, and the real exchange rate is modeled for a sample of ten developing countries. The studies find strong evidence that over the medium term, money financing of the deficit leads to higher inflation, while debt financing leads to higher real interest rates or increased repression of financial markets, with the fiscal gains coming at increasingly unfavorable terms. Consumers respond differently to conventional taxes, unconventional taxes (through inflation or interest and credit controls), and debt financing, in ways that make fiscal adjustment the most effective means of increasing national saving. Private investment—but not private consumption—is sensitive to the real interest rate, which rises under domestic borrowing to finance the deficit. Contrary to the popular presumption, in some countries private investment increases when public investment decreases. There is strong evidence that fiscal deficits spill over into external deficits, leading to appreciation of the real exchange rate. Fiscal deficits and growth are self-reinforcing: good fiscal management preserves access to foreign lending and avoids the crowding out of private investment, while growth stabilizes the budget and improves the fiscal position. The virtuous circle of growth and good fiscal management is one of the strongest arguments for a policy of low and stable fiscal deficits.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 132 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?1989Is public expenditure productive?1984Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic 1985On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing 1985A Guide to Public Sector Debt and Deficits 1989The Sustainability of Government Deficits: Implications of the Present-Value Borrowing Constraint 1984Government Policy and Private Investment in Developing Countries (Politique des pouvoirs publics et investissement prive dans les pays en developpement) (Politica estatal e inversion privada en los paises en desarrollo)1990Private investment and economic growth in developing countries

Cited by

1996MACROECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT AND POVERTY IN AFRICA: AN EMERGING PICTURE 2012Does human capital constrain the impact of foreign direct investment and remittances on economic growth in Ghana?2001Fiscal Policy in a Growth Framework 2008Budget Deficits and Interest Rates 2008Budget Deficits and Interest Rates: A Fresh Perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.