No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Knowledge of medieval Islamic medical practice has traditionally been based on the analysis of learned treatises.However, a comparison of the therapeutic advice advocated in formal treatises with treatments prescribed to patients has shown that the appeal to theory was to a large extent neglected in practice and, therefore, that theoretical works are not a reliable account of reality. 1 From this perspective, case histories may prove to be an invaluable source for medical historians studying medical practice in medieval Islam.Yet, case histories-as well as prescriptions for actual patients, clinical observations, and medical anecdotes-are, none the less, literary sources, and we may well stumble on the same stone twice as we did when studying theoretical treatises regardless of literary and social contexts.The purpose of this paper is mainly to question whether the varying categories of clinical accounts can be treated as reliable guides to medieval Islamic clinical practice.The question of whether medieval Islamic medical authors deliberately followed a particular style of clinical account common among ancient
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.