Research Misconduct Policies of High Impact Biomedical Journals

Barbara K. Redman · Jon F. Merz

11 citations0/0 files storedAccountability in Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

Several national and international organizations have recommended policies regarding journal responsibilities about research misconduct in submitted or published manuscripts. A search of Web sites of the fifty highest impact journals in a cluster of biomedical fields and a limited survey of their editors shows that few journals have formally adopted standards for dealing with questions of research misconduct. Publicly available policies may have a deterrent effect and can prevent arbitrariness in handling cases.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine.2005Taking on the cheats 1989American medical association manual of style 1981Fraud in Science: How Much, How Serious?1983The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie?1986Laboratory fraud: Another damned by publications 1994Dr. Roger Poisson: "I have learned my lesson the hard way".

Cited by

2015The eligibility of Public Administration research for ethics review: a case study of two international peer-reviewed journals

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.