Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An Open Science Peer Review Oath

8 references·5 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
2014Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility1,247 cited
2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
2014Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials75 cited
2011Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy35 cited

Cited by

2017The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices98 cited
2018Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research27 cited
2021An Overview of Post-Publication Peer Review27 cited
2020Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research13 cited
2021The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work