this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
- 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.23,941 cited
- 1965Akufo and Ibarapa16,917 cited
- 1994Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.9,841 cited
- 1996EuroQol: the current state of play5,859 cited
- 1997Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States4,547 cited
- 2005Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D1,355 cited
- 2005US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States1,281 cited
- 2003Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public431 cited
- 2004Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population375 cited
- 2013Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states347 cited
- 2009Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states261 cited
- 2006The Elgar Companion to Health Economics258 cited
- 2000Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?214 cited
- 2009Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work