SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
When is it appropriate to conduct a(nother) systematic review?
8 references·0 citing·34 second hop
When is it appropriate to conduct a(nother) systematic review? (2015)When is it appropriate to conduct a(nothe…Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination (2015)Recent meta-analyses neglect …PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2014)PROSPERO: an international pr…Citation Classics in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Who Wrote the Top 100 Most Cited Articles? (2013)Citation Classics in Systemat…Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors (2013)Bibliometrics of systematic r…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Promise and Problems of Meta-Analysis (1997)The Promise and Problems of M…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines (2016)The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar (2017)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)How to Write a Systematic Review (2007)A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology (2019)Ten simple rules for carrying out and writing meta-analyses (2019)A historical review of publication bias (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis (1994)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination (2000)Meta‐Analysis in Medical Research (2005)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process (2010)Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation (2011)The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia (2015)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review (2018)Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2015)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Factors Affecting Workforce Turnover in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,725 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,544 cited
  • 2014PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews567 cited
  • 1997The Promise and Problems of Meta-Analysis403 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors122 cited
  • 2013Citation Classics in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Who Wrote the Top 100 Most Cited Articles?86 cited
  • 2015Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination63 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work