Preserving Preservationism: A Reply to Lackey

Thomas D. Senor

60 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Abstract

Although I do not find Lackey's cases to be instances of epistemic generation in the absence of doxastic generation, I do believe that there are such examples.Interestingly, they do not prevent a carefully articulated version of preservationism from being true.For a discussion of this, see my as yet unpublished paper, "Epistemic Generation and Memory."

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016Preservationism in the Epistemology of Memory 2009In defence of gullibility: the epistemology of testimony and the psychology of deception detection 2019Knowledge from Non-Knowledge 2021Standing to epistemically blame 2007Why Memory Really Is a Generative Epistemic Source: A Reply to Senor 2017Knowledge From Forgetting 2014Cognitive Penetrability and Ethical Perception 2023Imagination as a generative source of justification

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.