SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience
10 references·10 citing·37 second hop
Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience (2007)Peer review for the evaluation of academi…The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments (2006)The policy challenges of peer…Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)Impact of bibliometrics upon …Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university (2004)Peer reviews and bibliometric…Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research (2001)Influence of interdisciplinar…Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria (1998)Comparative analysis of a set…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Nepotism and sexism in peer-r…Rational Disagreement in Peer Review (1985)Rational Disagreement in Peer…Assessing basic research (1983)Assessing basic researchChance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking (2022)Creating evaluative homogenei…Large-scale assessment of research outputs through a weighted combination of bibliometric indicators (2016)Large-scale assessment of res…The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores (2015)The influence of time and dis…The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores (2015)The influence of time and dis…How good is a model based on bibliometric indicators in predicting the final decisions made by peers? (2014)How good is a model based on …Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions (2014)Definition of a model based o…Correlations between bibliometrics and peer evaluation for all disciplines: the evaluation of Brazilian scientists (2013)Correlations between bibliome…University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization (2012)University Third mission in I…Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis (2011)Computer science research in …L’évaluation de la recherche : l’exemple de trois pays européens (2010)L’évaluation de la recherche …Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? (2007)A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)The politics of publication (2003)Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism (2007)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)Impact factors can mislead (1996)Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics (2002)Academic entrepreneurship (2009)Journal rankings in management and business studies: What rules do we play by? (2017)Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2006)Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)The postgutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here (1995)Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings (2008)Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity (2009)‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities (2007)Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices (2012)Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science (2015)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences (2003)The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics (2007)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2005Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?603 cited
  • 1983Assessing basic research528 cited
  • 1998Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria191 cited
  • 2006The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments179 cited
  • 2004Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university177 cited
  • 2001Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research110 cited
  • 1985Rational Disagreement in Peer Review74 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis37 cited
  • 2012University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization32 cited
  • 2014How good is a model based on bibliometric indicators in predicting the final decisions made by peers?32 cited
  • 2013Correlations between bibliometrics and peer evaluation for all disciplines: the evaluation of Brazilian scientists

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited
  • 2014Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions27 cited
  • 2016Large-scale assessment of research outputs through a weighted combination of bibliometric indicators27 cited
  • 2015The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores26 cited
  • 2015The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores21 cited
  • 2022Creating evaluative homogeneity: Experience of constructing a national journal ranking12 cited
  • 2010L’évaluation de la recherche : l’exemple de trois pays européens12 cited