Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA

16 references·9 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement1,391 cited
1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement437 cited
2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
2008A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

145 cited

2009Quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted in Japan: Evaluation of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement59 cited

2011Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas50 cited

2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited

Cited by

2017Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture combined with another treatment for stroke28 cited
2014Adverse event reporting in nonpharmacologic, noninterventional pain clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review27 cited
2016Assessment of Reporting Quality in Randomised Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Using the Consort Statement and Stricta Guidelines21 cited
2015STRICTA: is it time to do more?17 cited
2017Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture treatment for vascular dementia17 cited
2019Assessment of the quality of reporting in studies of acupuncture for patients with cancer using the STRICTA guidelines17 cited
2016Impact evaluation of CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines on reporting quality for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture conducted in China16 cited
2020Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials16 cited
2015Quality of randomized controlled trials reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China9 cited