Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Eminence of scientists in the light of the h -index and other scientometric indicators

12 references·16 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
1974Social Stratification in Science1,197 cited
2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups619 cited
2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
2004Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies495 cited
1970A rating of graduate programs494 cited
2003Characteristics of highly cited papers491 cited
2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
2005Index aims for fair ranking of scientists388 cited
2004Measuring Science279 cited
1978Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited199 cited

Cited by

2010The h‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator112 cited
2008Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h -index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster102 cited
2008An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

93 cited

2017The h-index Debate: An Introduction for Librarians87 cited

2009The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact83 cited

2010Psychiatry and the Hirsch h -index: The Relationship Between Journal Impact Factors and Accrued Citations79 cited

2017Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance77 cited

2009The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index77 cited

2009The index is the best measure of a scientist's research productivity72 cited

2009In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices72 cited

2012Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h-type variants, and some traditional bibliometric indicators71 cited

2008The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Web of Science64 cited

2008The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases62 cited

2009A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors60 cited

2015Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries54 cited

2009Science indicators and science patterns in Europe53 cited