AN ALTERNATIVE MEASURE OF EFFECT SIZE FOR COCHRAN'S Q TEST FOR RELATED PROPORTIONS

Kenneth J. Berry · Janis E. Johnston · Paul W. Mielke

35 citations0/0 files storedPerceptual and Motor Skills

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

Measures of effect size are increasingly important in psychological research. In this paper, a chance-corrected measure of effect size is introduced for Cochran's Q test.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.1904The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things 2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 1955Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding 1981Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives 1985The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation 1970Bivariate Agreement Coefficients for Reliability of Data

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.