Lowest Cost Intermodal Rail Freight Transport Bundling Networks: Conceptual Structuring and Identification

Abstract

Bundling, the process of transporting goods belonging to different flows in a common vehicle (like train, barge or truck) or other unit during part of their journey, is a core business of the transport sector. Operators periodically evaluate their service networks and adjust their bundling operations. The adjustments respond to changing cost structures, changing competition and changing situations in terms of demand and performance requirements. One can distinguish direct bundling from different types of complex bundling, such as hub-and-spoke or line bundling. Complex bundling networks have intermediate exchange nodes and longer routes, but less vehicle routes. The latter means that required network volumes could be lower, service frequencies higher or vehicle loads larger. In this sense, complex bundling allows smaller flows to participate in the advantages of large-scale operations and therefore is an important option to successfully develop intermodal transport. The additional impedance of complex bundling networks has been and still is an incentive for intermodal rail freight operators to switch from complex to direct bundling. However, the flow sizes of many rail relations are too small for direct bundling. If nevertheless direct bundling is applied, trainloads or service frequencies decline and/or small flows will shift to the road sector. In this paper, which focuses on intermodal rail freight networks, we analyse the trends of bundling innovation, and discuss the operational mechanisms in bundling networks and their quantitative impact for the number of train routes, service frequency, the size of trainloads, and required network transport volume. Furthermore we identify which bundling types lead to large trainloads and lowest costs, given certain network transport volumes and certain service frequency requirements. On the basis of a large-scale comparison of bundling networks with large trainloads and ones with lowest costs we conclude, that a large trainload is a good first indicator for lowest cost network: if an intermodal basic bundling network has the largest technically allowed trainload and this is larger than of competing bundling types, the envisaged network is likely to also have the lowest network costs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.