SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study
11 references·2 citing·46 second hop
The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study (2015)The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QU…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis (2013)Impact of STROBE Statement Pu…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration (2008)The SQUIRE (Standards for QUa…The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1. (2008)The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Fig…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature (2002)Quality of reporting of rando…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (1995)Reporting Randomized Controll…Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles (2016)Narrative Review of Statistic…SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement (2015)SQUIRE and the evolving scien…Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals (2007)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network (2016)CONSORT-Equity 2017 extension and elaboration for better reporting of health equity in randomised trials (2017)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines (1997)Improving Reports of Studies of Diagnostic Tests (2003)Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020)TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models (2020)A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake (2021)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed (2010)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 2008The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration446 cited
  • 2008The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1.407 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2013Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis101 cited
  • 1995Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials81 cited
  • 2002Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature48 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement12 cited