Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS

7 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,626 cited
1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,334 cited
1985ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS631 cited
1998EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT470 cited
1997BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH ON CHOICE RESPONDING236 cited
1991ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS AND REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS187 cited
1981REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN162 cited

Cited by

2008ON THE APPLIED USE OF PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT99 cited
2001EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS OF STIMULI IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRETREATMENT AND DAILY BRIEF PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS98 cited
2013Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature96 cited
2000EFFECTS OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT ON PROBLEM BEHAVIOR AND STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF SATIATION, EXTINCTION, AND ALTERNATIVE REINFORCEMENT84 cited
2008REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE: AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER EFFICACY67 cited
2014Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers67 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007

Assessment protocol for identifying preferred social consequences

65 cited

2009ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULE ASSESSMENTS OF STIMULUS VALUE64 cited

2009EVALUATION OF THE MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS WITHOUT REPLACEMENT PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT METHOD USING ACTIVITIES AS STIMULI61 cited

2006ESTABLISHMENT OF MANDS FOLLOWING TACT TRAINING AS A FUNCTION OF REINFORCER STRENGTH58 cited

2008PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UNDER PROGRESSIVE‐ AND FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES: A COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND CONCURRENT ARRANGEMENTS55 cited

2012ASSESSING PREFERENCE FOR SOCIAL INTERACTION IN CHILDREN DIAGNOSED WITH AUTISM52 cited

2010ON THE RELATION BETWEEN REINFORCER EFFICACY AND PREFERENCE52 cited

2008EVALUATION OF ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE REINFORCER VALUE USING PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES50 cited

2012Assessing preference for social interactions48 cited

2008ASSESSING POTENCY OF HIGH‐ AND LOW‐PREFERENCE REINFORCERS WITH RESPECT TO RESPONSE RATE AND RESPONSE PATTERNS48 cited