Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis
Abstract
While the importance of being reflexive is acknowledged within social science research, the difficulties, practicalities and methods of doing it are rarely addressed. Thus, the implications of current theoretical and philosophical discussions about reflexivity, epistemology and the construction of knowledge for empirical socio-logical research practice, specifically the analysis of qualitative data, remain under-developed. Drawing on our doctoral experiences, we reflect on the possibilities and limits of reflexivity during the interpretive stages of research. We explore how reflexivity can be operationalized and discuss reflexivity in terms of the personal, interpersonal, institutional, pragmatic, emotional, theoretical, epistemological and ontological influences on our research and data analysis processes. We argue that data analysis methods are not just neutral techniques. They reflect, and are imbued with, theoretical, epistemological and ontological assumptions – including conceptions of subjects and subjectivities, and understandings of how knowledge is constructed and produced. In suggesting how epistemological and ontological positionings can be translated into research practice, our chapter contributes to current debates aiming to bridge the gap between abstract epistemological discussions and the nitty-gritty of research practice.
Cite this
Natasha S. Mauthner, Andrea Doucet (2003). Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002
@article{s2003reflexive,
title = {Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis},
author = {Mauthner, Natasha S. and Doucet, Andrea},
year = {2003},
journal = {Sociology},
doi = {10.1177/00380385030373002}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,390 citations exist upstream.