EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT JOURNALS: A SECOND LOOK.

Irwin Weinstock

139 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Business Strategies and Management Research

Abstract

The article reviews several U.S. business journals including “Administrative Science Quarterly,” the “Academy of Management Journal,” and the “Harvard Business Review.”

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 139 citations exist upstream.

References

1964Work and motivation

Cited by

2002Review : Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review1, 2 1986Research in Management Information Systems, 1980-1984: Points of Work and Reference 2004Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance 1985The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Management Research: An Alternative Ranking 1994JOURNAL INFLUENCE IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT: AN ANALYSIS USING SALANCIK'S INDEX IN A DEPENDENCY NETWORK.1987Research Methodology in Organizational Studies 2000A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Journal Rankings: The Case of Formal Lists 1991Quantitative methods in cross‐national management research: Trends and equivalence issues

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.