SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Revisiones sistemáticas de estudios epidemiológicos. Un instrumento para la evidencia en fisioterapia
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Revisiones sistemáticas de estudios epidemiológicos. Un instrumento para la evidencia en fisioterapia (2009)Revisiones sistemáticas de estudios epide…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2008)A Dictionary of EpidemiologyA Dictionary of Epidemiology (2008)A Dictionary of EpidemiologyProcedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Procedures for Performing Sys…Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (2001)Systematic Reviews of Observa…Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (2001)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology (1999)Traditional reviews, meta-ana…Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies (1998)Meta-analysis Spurious precis…Epidemiology Faces Its Limits (1995)Epidemiology Faces Its LimitsMultiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language (1994)Multiple blinded reviews of t…Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? (1994)Is there gender bias in JAMA'…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? (1997)How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) (1997)Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review (2011)Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review (2019)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2004Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews5,198 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,312 cited
  • 2008A Dictionary of Epidemiology2,175 cited
  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,374 cited
  • 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies997 cited
  • 1995Epidemiology Faces Its Limits841 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables757 cited
  • 1999Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology594 cited
  • 2001Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials238 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies213 cited
  • 2008A Dictionary of Epidemiology205 cited
  • 1994Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language158 cited
  • 1994

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
134 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.