Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer

8 references·12 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?287 cited
2006Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey195 cited
2007An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem175 cited
2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
1998Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance141 cited
2007The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality139 cited
2007Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants60 cited
2012Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science60 cited

Cited by

2018The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals30 cited
2015The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers25 cited
2014Editorial Misconduct—Definition, Cases, and Causes23 cited
2022Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review20 cited
2014Advancing Kinesiology Through Improved Peer Review20 cited
2017The emerging landscape of scientific publishing18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017

Reviewers’ Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Journalism and Mass Communication

17 cited

2013Free for Service: The Inadequate Incentives for Quality Peer Review16 cited

2015Scholarly peer reviewing′: The art, its joys and woes13 cited

2020Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research13 cited

2013Appropriate Roles for the Subscriber, Publisher, Editor, Author, and Reviewer in the Archives of Plastic Surgery11 cited

2022Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish?10 cited