References

• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
• 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
• 2009The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study247 cited
• 2007Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials189 cited
• 2006Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors150 cited
• 2007Reported methodological quality of split‐mouth studies122 cited
• 2007A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology Literature89 cited
• 2002Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials63 cited
• 2008Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement.60 cited
• 2011The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry