Does Measuring L2 Utterance Fluency Equal Measuring Overall L2 Proficiency? Evidence From Five Languages

Wendy Baker‐Smemoe · Dan P. Dewey · Jennifer Bown · Rob A. Martinsen

45 citations0/0 files storedForeign Language Annals

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Phonetics and Phonology Research Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Abstract

Abstract The current study examined the relationship between overall second language (L2) proficiency and utterance fluency measures for several L2s in order to determine whether utterance measures can be used to predict L2 proficiency. The study measured the speech rate, number of hesitations, number and length of pauses, number and length of runs, and number of false starts using excerpts from 126 ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interviews (OPIs) spoken by 86 participants. Forty of the participants provided pre‐ and post‐OPI speech samples, which also allowed examination of changes over time. All 86 participants were native English speakers who spoke L2 French, German, Japanese, Arabic, or Russian. They ranged in proficiency from Novice Mid to Superior. Results suggested that some L2 utterance fluency measures correlated significantly with overall L2 proficiency for all L2s, but data also revealed some differences across L2s. These differences hinged partly on the L2's relative difficulty for native English speakers. Results suggested that it might be feasible to use specific fluency measures to estimate proficiency, in particular at higher levels, but that fine‐grained sublevel estimates would not be recommended, in particular at the Novice and Intermediate levels.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

2001Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing 2009Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis 1994Teaching Language in Context 1990Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach*2010Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency 1998Language Processing and Second Language Development 2004CONTEXT, CONTACT, AND COGNITION IN ORAL FLUENCY ACQUISITION: Learning Spanish in At Home and Study Abroad Contexts 2004Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners

Cited by

2020Computer-assisted assessment of phonetic fluency in a second language: a longitudinal study of Japanese learners of French 2023Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance 2019Willingness to Communicate and Second Language Speech Fluency: An Investigation of Affective and Cognitive Dynamics 2021Development of second language speech fluency in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study 2021

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.