No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Over the last 10 years there has been much debate about the impact of the rise of the Internet and other digital technologies on traditional news media, such as newspapers. The influence of the Internet on news reporting is often formulated in terms of threats to existing, traditional journalism, as well as new opportunities for revitalizing journalistic routines. One dominant focus in earlier studies is the technology-driven approach. These studies (e.g., Pavlik, 2000) suggest that news content is crucially determined by the available technologies. Hence, changes in journalism can be explained predominantly by technological developments. Despite their valuable insights, these earlier studies contributed little to our understanding of how adoption processes of digital technologies may evolve in different user-contexts (Boczkowski, 2004). A more fruitful approach in this respect stems from the integrated perspective of social constructivism. Here, the adoption of innovations is seen as a complex interaction process between professional, organizational, and economic factors (Boczkowski, 2004; Paulussen & Ugille, 2008). With this in mind, the role of social context factors, such as working conditions, workplace organization, and professional values, should be taken into consideration when studying the adoption of technological innovations in news media. So far, and despite the growing body of research on these social context factors shaping the impact of digital technology in journalism, the majority of the existing research is based upon small samples of journalists working with one platform only (often within online newsrooms) (Paulussen & Ugille, 2008; Thurman, 2008), or concentrates on either organizational structures or professional attitudes (Boczkowski, 2004; Singer, 2004). Our study is an attempt to examine how the use of Internet applications by journalists working in mainstream news media is influenced by social context factors, such as background characteristics, work-related factors, and the perceived utility of Internet use as part of the daily journalistic routines. We suggest that implementation of technological innovations not only leads to changes in the daily routines of journalists, but also leads to redefining notions about themselves as professionals (cf. Deuze, 2004). Therefore this study also looks into the relation between journalists' professional opinions about the impact of the Internet on journalistic values on the one hand, and their actual use patterns on the other. It adds empirical insights to the often more contemplative discussions of the impact of the Internet on journalism. Although journalists may be seen as a homogeneous occupational group, they are not expected to use all possibilities provided by the Internet to an equal extent and for the same purposes. Earlier studies indicate that differences occur between journalists in terms of how, and to what extent they use the Internet in their daily work (Garrison, 2000; Hui-Ming, 2001; Niebauer, Abott, Corbin, & Neibergergall, 2000). Such research often results in descriptive analyses of how journalists use the Internet. However, further research into possible relations between context variables and differences in Internet use remains scarce (cf. Garrison, 2003; Maier, 2000). This study focuses on the use of Internet applications by journalists in the Low Countries (the Netherlands and Flanders). First, we looked into the variety of Internet applications that journalists use professionally. Subsequently, taking into account background characteristics, work activities, media platforms, and professional opinions about the impact of the Internet on journalism, this study focuses on finding relations between social context variables on the one hand and the differences in the actual use of Internet applications on the other. There is no doubt that the rise of the Internet as a technological innovation has influenced journalism. Certain transformations can be highlighted, such as shifts in the news flow, in the daily journalistic routines, and in professional accountability. First, the news flow has evolved; traditionally news was produced mainly by professional journalists who distributed their stories through mainstream news media. Nowadays, the Internet, as an open and accessible source of information, provides broad opportunities for all kind of news exchanges among a wide audience. The Internet offers a platform for a potential group of (non)professional news producers, thereby diminishing traditional boundaries of gathering, producing, and disseminating news. Second, the daily practice of journalists has changed because of the new possibilities provided by the Internet. The importance of the Internet as a news-gathering instrument is no longer questioned. Throughout the world journalists have incorporated the Internet into their daily routines of news production (Hui-Ming, 2001; Lünenbürger-Reidenbach et al., 2000; Quinn, 1999; Trumbo, Sprecker, Dumlao, Yun, & Duke, 2001). Third, the traditional responsibility for news production and circulation is no longer the task exclusively of journalists. Journalists' occupational roles demand attitudes different from the traditional gatekeeping role, and may shift more to activities such as interpretation and reflection (Bardoel, 2002). The process of storytelling is turned around, as it were: The journalist presents the public with annotated archives from various sources of information that the citizen can access at a later date (Deuze, 2003; Matheson, 2004). The traditional asymmetrical relationship, in which the journalist determines what is important news for citizens, shifts to a more symmetrical relationship in which the journalist is more responsive and assumes the role of a partner (cf. Bardoel, 2002; Pavlik, 2001). In light of the changes the Internet brings to journalism, many authors voice their concerns about the impact of the Internet on journalism (Grabowicz, 2003; Haas, 2006; Lasica, 2003). Pessimists refer mainly to the negative consequences, and view the Internet (and news blogs) as a direct threat to the professional values in the field of journalism. It is feared that the increased complexity in finding and verifying information at the expense of journalistic accuracy, will foster hasty and uncontrolled reports, (Hall, 2001; Manning, 2001). This fear is intensified by the increasing importance of speed and accessibility of information that leads to heightened pressure of workload and stress. Optimists view the changes brought about by the Internet as enriching. According to them, thanks to the Internet, every journalist can consult various sources faster and more easily, as a result of which reports become more varied and gain more contextual depth (Koch, 1991; Pavlik, 2001). Optimism about these developments shows confidence that breaking existing barriers between journalists and the public may improve journalism. The use of news sites and news blogs can demonstrate that news organizations are no longer monolithic companies, but a collection of individuals who work together as a team. Especially young people, who currently have relatively little interest in traditional news media such as newspapers, can be reached more easily through digital platforms. A third strand of researchers puts the strong influence of the Internet and other digital technologies on journalism into a more neutral perspective. Haas (2005) points out that throughout history, every new communication medium was wrongly proclaimed as a radical turning point for old media. According to him, after the initial implementation stage, not much will change, apart from practical improvements, and the changes that do occur will not lead to substantial shifts in journalism in general. The ‘Uses & Gratifications' (U&G) research tradition focuses on factors influencing motives for use and outcomes for people's media-related behaviour (Newhagen & Rafaeli, 1996). This research tradition assumes that people's use of media is codetermined by the degree to which this use of media does indeed satisfy people's needs (Palmgreen, Wenner & Rosengren, 1985). This approach allows for investigation of motivational access and online skills, choice of applicatons and diversity, or lack of these among journalists. It can be assumed that journalists, just like any other user group, use media strategically, and therefore will employ the Internet for different purposes. They will select Internet applications based on how well each option helps them to fulfill specific tasks or goals (Cho, Zuniga, Rojas & Shah, 2003). This implies that the degree of Internet use is to or that journalists to or have The Internet use by journalists on the perceived in their daily journalistic a new technology the daily routines of an and is for the same as journalists will the technology which the needs of journalistic research (Garrison, that the Internet as a technology is seen as a for the technology because the of the to their needs in daily routines. view the of the Internet in terms of the speed with which a variety of information sources and that in the perceived utility of the Internet is with Internet practical to the Internet (e.g., increased and of Internet use was at the Internet use of journalists in their occupational that we will on the use within their work of needs is within the news production and concentrates on the as a for In an to study the relation between the perceived utility of the Internet and the actual use of Internet the research was what extent do differences in perceived utility to the differences in journalists' actual use of Internet are a group of professionals with a specific occupational (Deuze, Singer, 2003; & 1996). The and routines in this professional group are through processes in and In journalistic activities to of daily routines within a studies that the daily activities of journalists are also determined by professional (e.g., within the 2004; & also on According to with a medium is part of and professional processes for many Despite the differences in work-related journalists are to professional in to out their They these in as well as on the these practical are and to a we of journalistic routines. These routines the of the news production process 2003; & 1996). With technological innovations like the Internet, journalists to the specific in to use of them, and them into their daily routines (Garrison, 2003). In to online information journalists to and journalistic skills, and become with and news that not in the of technological innovations is that in media production as well as at the organizational Singer, 2003; 2004). in study on in the of and online media that journalists have an as they to an view of and to and storytelling are more to In the focus is from working for a medium a in which journalists are to news for media This that there is a demand for journalists to work in a journalists to become (Deuze, & 2004; In to out this increased workload at journalists more in and journalistic In the it is to that the for journalists the to into account new as part of the more skills, more 2008). on the influence that background and such as media and journalistic activities, have on the use of Internet the research what extent are differences in and journalistic background to differences in the use of Internet what extent are work-related factors such as of media and journalistic activities to differences in the use of Internet The rise of the Internet a new to the about the influence of technological innovations on journalism. the background of changes in news it is to be expected that journalists themselves also a at the influence that these developments have on their professional field of themselves part of a new of news The changes and communication patterns will influence the journalists are not only in their work but also in their the more traditional journalists, to be more about the of technological innovations in the on professional of accuracy, and (Garrison, 2003). With the of the Internet as a source of information, have been about the potential impact of the use of the Internet on journalistic The Internet provides a variety of online and 2001). accessible within an (Grabowicz, 2003). and sources have become easily and Hence, the speed and of the process has increased journalists' work in terms of and 2006; Lasica, 2003). However, these developments are not The of information journalists to with the information and to the news of The Internet has increased pressure in the news production process and the for Hence, traditional news values, such as verifying and the of may pressure with negative for the of journalism. We that journalists' perceived or negative impact of the use of the Internet on the professional will the they use Internet According to journalists in the Internet as a source to their professional The of the Internet sources accessible is not Hence, when such information, it may be to journalistic and among also that journalists have about the of Internet information, as the often of the information on that is an important journalistic it is to be expected that journalists have to have a degree of in the information they on the Internet in to use of it in the degree to which they the Internet a source & 2006; 2004). the of the information and therefore the of the source are important factors in the these are expected to the or not to use Internet who traditionally use of sources can gain access to a broad of digital the Internet with accessibility to many allows journalists to information from a much the use of the Internet has been and integrated into the daily activities of journalists, the is to what extent the of Internet information may influence the use of various Internet the professional values into the research is there a relationship between journalists' perceived impact of the Internet use on professional values such as and on the one hand, and the differences in actual use of Internet applications on the was in the Netherlands and the part of The was in a of journalists from the which of out of about journalists in the The was to the journalists, by a journalists a of The was in the of a of the of of all journalists are of the the journalists a of The adoption of the Internet was by journalists to indicate to what extent they use different Internet We applications that available to in The Internet applications in the the online and The to values how many of the Internet applications daily a was for these the daily with which journalists use the Internet applications each Although this does not into account daily use of an Internet the does indicate the degree to which the use of Internet applications is in journalistic routines. opinions about and and opinions of journalists with to journalism and the Internet into an the of the be In with research et al., the refer to utility of the Internet, in the degree to which the Internet is perceived as an important source for new and increased work to the Internet. The third and can be as of important journalistic values, and of Internet information can be into different of Internet information in of Internet information from of Internet information from The to the perceived of journalistic Internet use for accuracy, or lack of journalism. The of the is in of of The to these on a a a with the opinions and attitudes only in the when they to at of the of each activities and of The journalists to indicate which journalistic activities they out on the The activities other people's taking and more one be from this journalists to indicate within which of they out these A was public newspapers, newspapers, interest and and professional for of such as the journalistic and also taken into was in with equal of 10 years from the was professional the of the was these with professional was by journalists how many years they have been working in the of journalism. They also or not they have journalistic In to the was variables of and of Hence, of and in the as The group was as a with which the & 2002). The different journalistic activities and of are The of all variables journalism activities, media can be as differences in the of use of Internet The are for the our results that applications are in the daily practice of journalists. all journalists use applications on a daily and the and are a of a The use of Internet applications such as and to be only The of use of these applications for professional is relatively a or The results of the can be in The that in with the and the Internet is to satisfy daily professional It to be a to improve the work of the journalists. First, we looked at the relation between journalists' of the Internet as a utility for their professional work and and their actual use of Internet With to the utility of the Internet, a between the perceived importance of the Internet to new the perceived impact of the Internet on increased and actual use of Internet The of the Internet to finding new information, and with the extent to which journalists use Internet applications journalists who the Internet as an to fulfill the needs of their daily to use Internet applications more often who to of the use of Internet applications on background characteristics, activities, media and professional opinions explained are of the use of Internet applications on background characteristics, activities, media and professional opinions explained are of about the Internet and journalism are not of shows on of this from the leads to The does not this of about the Internet and journalism are not of shows on of this from the leads to The does not this of use of Internet applications of use of Internet applications With respect to professional values of Internet information, of specific of and perceived impact on and the in which these to the extent to which journalists use Internet indicate a negative relation between perceived of Internet information in on the one hand, and actual use on the other. However, journalists who Internet information as more to use Internet applications This finding is to our there was no to perceived of online information from or in the of easily journalists to the source of the source provides information online or the other of journalistic values, accuracy, no with the use of Internet So the perceived or negative impact of the Internet use on journalistic does not to the use of Internet applications Our only small differences among journalists in the use of Internet applications in terms of background and work-related With to it that journalists years and use Internet applications journalists to journalistic to a role in the of the daily use of Internet The same to journalistic In Internet applications are not Despite our of finding more differences between work-related factors and the use of Internet the differences and in only a However, journalists who work as a use Internet applications journalists other This may be explained by the that often work the and information from journalists who as a do not use Internet applications more often their who other at the of media in which journalists our results that journalists in use Internet applications much more working for other media working for interest and news to use Internet applications their there is a relation between journalists working for media such as and blogs and their use of Internet These results that journalists working for blogs use Internet applications more often journalists working for other media this result was for the activities journalists these differences can only be to the different of media in which journalists It that the perceived of practical are for journalists to use the Internet. This finding is in with the formulated in the approach. use Internet applications more often when they the their needs to do their In this study thi
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.