Word and Objects

Agustín Rayo

103 citations0/0 files storedNoûs

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and Theoretical Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to show that the subject-matter of ontology is richer than one might have thought. Our route will be indirect. We will argue that there are circumstances under which standard first-order regimentation is unacceptable, and that more appropriate varieties of regimentation lead to unexpected kinds of ontological commitment. Quine has taught us that ontological inquiry—inquiry as to what there is—can be separated into two distinct tasks. 1 On the one hand, there is the problem of determining the ontological commitments of a given theory; on the other, the problem of deciding what theories to accept. The objects whose existence we have reason to believe in are then the ontological commitments of the theories we have reason to accept. Regarding the former of these two tasks, Quine maintains that a first-order theory is committed to the existence of an object satisfying a certain predicate if and only if some object satisfying that predicate must be admitted among the values of the theory’s variables in order for the theory to be true. Quine’s criterion is extremely attractive, but it applies only to theories that are couched in first-order languages. Offhand this is not a serious constraint, because most of our theories have straightforward first-order regimentations. But here we shall see that there is a special kind of tension between regimenting our discourse in a first-order language and allowing our quantifiers to range over absolutely everything. 2 We will proceed on the assumption that absolutely unrestricted quantification is possible, and show that an important class of English sentences resists first-order regimentation. This will lead us to develop alternate languages of regimentation, languages containing plural

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.

References

1960Word and Object 1983Frege : Philosophy of language. By Michael Dummett. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. Pp. xliii, 708.2001The Logical Form of Action Sentences 1972On What There is 1984To Be is to be a Value of a Variable (or to be Some Values of Some Variables)1980A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions 1997Plurals and events . By Barry Schein. (Current studies in linguistics, 23.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. Pp. xv, 384.2001Nominalism Through De‐Nominalization

Cited by

2011Composition as Identity: Part 1 2013Composition as General Identity 2015On the Innocence and Determinacy of Plural Quantification 2008Superplurals in English 2008On Specifying Truth-Conditions 2008Superplurals in English

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.