No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Mergers have become a generally accepted solution to a broad set of managerial problems in practice. However,research on mergers and acquisitions provides a rather sceptical view as to the success of mergers in solvingbusiness problems. The current paper aims at investigating the public discourse on mergers and acquisitions andits relation to the scientific discourse. The public discourse is studied by an analysis of Swedish media reports onthe Astra Zeneca merger. More specifically we study the actors given voice in the discourse, the temporalevolution of the discourse and the arguments voiced. We conclude that the discourse is dominated by journalists,managers and financial analysts who all generate arguments based on a rather narrow “efficiency theoretical”basis. This is in conflict with current insights in research on mergers and acquisitions that has proposed morevalid and complex models for understanding mergers. The reasons and consequences of this discrepancybetween the public and the scientific discourses are discussed.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.