SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms
12 references·16 citing·40 second hop
Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms (2011)Reforming Science: Methodological and Cul…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence (2010)Article 50 million: an estima…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Publish or Perish (2007)Publish or PerishWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The Role of the Priority Rule in Science (2003)The Role of the Priority Rule…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA (1968)The Double Helix: A Personal …Preregistering qualitative research (2019)Preregistering qualitative re…Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam (2019)Perceptions of research integ…Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education (2018)Promoting Open Science to Inc…Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Peer review: The experience a…Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies (2016)Publish or Perish mantra in t…Life Science’s Average Publishable Unit (APU) Has Increased over the Past Two Decades (2016)Life Science’s Average Publis…Retention of Underrepresented Minority Faculty: Strategic Initiatives for Institutional Value Proposition Based on Perspectives from a Range of Academic Institutions. (2015)Retention of Underrepresented…Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science (2015)Linguistic Obfuscation in Fra…Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? (2015)Competitive Science: Is Compe…Specialized Science (2014)Specialized ScienceSources of error in the retracted scientific literature (2014)Sources of error in the retra…Guiding the Way (2014)Guiding the WayFinancial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research (2014)A Call for Examining Replicat…Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Whither research integrity? P…Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science (2012)Science or Art? How Aesthetic…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms (2003)Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists? (2004)The Missing Motivation in Macroeconomics (2007)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Educating English Language Learners (2006)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Design-Based Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2007Publish or Perish728 cited
  • 1968The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA638 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2010Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence401 cited
  • 2003The Role of the Priority Rule in Science345 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Preregistering qualitative research312 cited
  • 2012Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science274 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
189 cited
  • 2013Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment171 cited
  • 2015Retention of Underrepresented Minority Faculty: Strategic Initiatives for Institutional Value Proposition Based on Perspectives from a Range of Academic Institutions.157 cited
  • 2018Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education128 cited
  • 2015Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?126 cited
  • 2015Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science113 cited
  • 2014Specialized Science100 cited
  • 2014A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research98 cited
  • 2016Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies94 cited
  • 2014Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature89 cited
  • 2019Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam83 cited
  • 2017Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers77 cited
  • 2014Guiding the Way75 cited
  • 2016Life Science’s Average Publishable Unit (APU) Has Increased over the Past Two Decades73 cited