Heraclitus' Quarrel with Polymathy and Historie

Herbert Granger

33 citations0/0 files storedTransactions of the American Philological Association (1974-)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Philosophy and Thought Classical Antiquity Studies Classical Studies and Philology

Abstract

Heraclitus' attitude towards polymathy (B40) and inquiry or historiê (B129) is controversial, although most scholars believe that he was a practicing histôr who thought that polymathy was a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for "understanding." Through a study of historiê and polymathy as practiced by those whom Heraclitus explicitly attacks, and by other practitioners of the sixth and fifth centuries, this paper argues that the Histores were dependent upon polymathy, and that since Heraclitus believes that polymathy is an impediment to understanding, he would not count himself among the polymaths and histores.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.

References

1951The Greeks and the Irrational 1952Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.1972Lore and science in ancient Pythagoreanism 2018The Presocratic Philosophers 1979The Art and Thought of Heraclitus 1930Early Greek Philosophy 1999The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy 1954The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought

Cited by

2007Poetry and Prose: Xenophanes of Colophon 2019Nietzsche's Metaphilosophy 2017Speaking and Acting the Truth: The Ethics of Heraclitus

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.