Embedded implicatures and optimality theoretic pragmatics

Abstract

In a recent paper, Chierchia (2004) distinguishes global and local approaches to conversational implicatures and claims that several puzzles concerning implicatures in complex sentences can best be explained by a local approach. This conflicts with the Neo-Gricean view which is global in nature. I will argue that both approaches can coexist in optimality theoretic pragmatics where the proper place is assigned to the two approaches: a global theory describes the principal forces that direct communication – it has a diachronic dimension and allows a rational foundation of conversational implicatures; a local theory describes the actual, synchronic dimension – it explains how online, incremental interpretation of complex sentences is possible. The connection between the two views results from assuming that the results of global optimization fossilize into a local mechanism of utterance processing.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.