Objectively Measured Residential Environment and Self-Reported Health: A Multilevel Analysis of UK Census Data

Frank Dunstan · David L. Fone · Myer Glickman

44 citations0/0 files storedPLoS ONE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Urban Transport and Accessibility Urban Green Space and Health

Abstract

Little is known about the association between health and the quality of the residential environment. What is known is often based on subjective assessments of the environment rather than on measurements by independent observers. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine the association between self-reported general health and an objectively assessed measure of the residential environment. We studied over 30,000 residents aged 18 or over living in 777 neighbourhoods in south Wales. Built environment quality was measured by independent observers using a validated tool, the Residential Environment Assessment Tool (REAT), at unit postcode level. UK Census data on each resident, which included responses to a question which assessed self-reported general health, was linked to the REAT score. The Census data also contained detailed information on socio-economic and demographic characteristics of all respondents and was also linked to the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. After adjusting for both the individual characteristics and area deprivation, respondents in the areas of poorest neighbourhood quality were more likely to report poor health compared to those living in areas of highest quality (OR 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.22-1.49). The particular neighbourhood characteristics associated with poor health were physical incivilities and measures of how well the residents maintained their properties. Measures of green space were not associated with self-reported health. This is the first full population study to examine such associations and the results demonstrate the importance for health of the quality of the neighbourhood area in which people live and particularly the way in which residents behave towards their own and their neighbours' property. A better understanding of causal pathways that allows the development of interventions to improve neighbourhood quality would offer significant potential health gains.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Neighborhoods and health 1986Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition 1992Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers 2010Fair society, healthy lives : the Marmot Review : strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010.2009Measuring the Built Environment for Physical Activity 2010Fair society, healthy lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010 2003Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis 2002Understanding self-rated health

Cited by

2019The Role of Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics on Mental Health after a Period of Economic Crisis in the Lisbon Region (Portugal): A Multilevel Analysis 2021The role of cultural, community and natural assets in addressing societal and structural health inequalities in the UK: future research priorities 2022Aging and self-reported health in 114 Latin American cities: gender and socio-economic inequalities 2016The impact of area residential property values on self-rated health: A cross-sectional comparative study of Seattle and Paris

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.