Troubled landscapes, troubling anthropology: co‐presence, necessity, and the making of ethnographic knowledge

Abstract

If ‘co‐presence is a condition of [anthropological] inquiry’ (Fabian), what sort of knowledge does it produce? I explore this question through an ethnography of a ‘troubled landscape’ in Malaysian Borneo: a lush, hilly region that has been the site of a dam construction and resettlement project since the late 2000s. My article uses the notion of co‐presence as both a lens through which to explore the predicaments of the four small communities affected by the scheme and a reflexive device that underscores the embeddedness of the ethnographic encounter in a larger relational field – one characterized as much by chance and necessity as it is by anthropologists’ intellectual agendas. In the process, I seek to trouble some of the methodological and ethical issues posed by anthropology's recent ‘ontological turn’, notably the long‐standing questions of what it means to ‘take seriously’ and how ethnography and the ethnographer are implicated in this project.

Cite this work

Stored copy: licence not recorded · source http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/11033/4/FullText.pdf. Open access only — a takedown request can remove the copy without touching this record.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.