Subsequent Publication of Orally Presented Original Studies within 5 Years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly

Lionel Arrivé · Pierre‐Yves Boëlle · Pascale Dono · Maïté Lewin · Laurence Monnier‐Cholley · J.M. Tubiana

70 citations0/0 files storedRadiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access Radiology practices and education

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the rate at which original studies that were presented orally at the 1995 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Scientific Assembly were published in Medline-indexed journals and to identify factors predictive of publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1995 RSNA Scientific Program was jointly reviewed by two readers. A total of 1,897 abstracts were included in the study. A Medline search of articles published between 1996 and 2000 was then conducted to identify articles written by the first, second, and/or last authors of all abstracts published in the 1995 RSNA Scientific Program. The year of publication, journal, country origin of the abstract, subspecialty, and nature of the research (ie, human, animal, or technical) were recorded. Publication rates were compared by using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-five abstracts were expanded into manuscripts that were subsequently published in Medline-indexed journals; thus, the publication rate was 33%. A study was published less than 3 years after the 1995 scientific assembly in 595 (94%) cases. Genitourinary radiology and chest radiology studies had the highest publication rates (46% and 48%, respectively; P <.01), whereas physics studies had the lowest (24%, P <.001). Technical studies (24%, P <.001) were less likely than human studies (36%, P <.001) to be published. The publication rate also differed substantially according to the country origin of the abstract. The articles were published in a total of 109 journals and chiefly in Radiology (211 cases, 33% of published studies). CONCLUSION: One-third of original studies presented orally at the 1995 scientific assembly were subsequently published in Medline-indexed journals. More articles were published in Radiology than in any other identified journal.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence 2000Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct 1994Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis 1998Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting 1994Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts

Cited by

2005Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000–2004 2008Publication Rates for Abstracts Presented by Korean Investigators at Major Radiology Meetings 2006Publication of Material Presented at Radiologic Meetings: Authors' Country and International Collaboration 2006Fate of Abstracts Presented at the World Congress of Endourology: Are They Followed by Publication in Peer-Reviewed Journals?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.