SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific impact of Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons plenary session abstracts increases in the era of the Academic Surgical Congress from 2006 to 2010
16 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Scientific impact of Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons plenary session abstracts increases in the era of the Academic Surgical Congress from 2006 to 2010 (2012)Scientific impact of Association for Acad…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2009)Publication Rates of Presenta…SUS/AAS abstracts: what is the scientific impact? (2008)SUS/AAS abstracts: what is th…Discrepancies and Rates of Publication in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Abstracts (2008)Discrepancies and Rates of Pu…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Factors Associated With the Full Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (2007)Factors Associated With the F…Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue? (2007)Bias towards publishing posit…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…From Meeting Presentation to Peer-Review Publication – a UK Review (2006)From Meeting Presentation to …More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review (2003)More insight into the fate of…BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS (2003)BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICA…Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Journal Prestige, Publication…Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? (2000)Short report: Do presenters t…Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Unpublished Research From a M…The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor”Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality (1997)Citations and journal impact …Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Full publication of results i…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts (1994)AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS (2002)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Publication bias and clinical trials (1987)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,877 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2002Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals656 cited
  • 2003BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS286 cited
  • 1997Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality279 cited
  • 1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting264 cited
  • 1998The Journal “Impact Factor”206 cited
  • 2003More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review197 cited
  • 2009Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons148 cited
  • 2000Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?101 cited
  • 2007Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?81 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies and Rates of Publication in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Abstracts76 cited
  • 2007Factors Associated With the Full Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

52 cited
  • 2006From Meeting Presentation to Peer-Review Publication – a UK Review43 cited
  • 2008SUS/AAS abstracts: what is the scientific impact?22 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts319 cited