How the tobacco industry built its relationship with Hollywood

C Mekemson · Stanton A. Glantz

146 citations0/0 files storedTobacco Control

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology Smoking Behavior and Cessation Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of the relationship between the tobacco industry and the entertainment industry. METHODS: Review of previously secret tobacco industry documents available on the internet. RESULTS: Both the entertainment and tobacco industries recognised the high value of promotion of tobacco through entertainment media. The 1980s saw undertakings by four tobacco companies, Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds (RJR), American Tobacco Company, and Brown and Williamson to place their products in movies. RJR and Philip Morris also worked to place products on television at the beginning of the decade. Each company hired aggressive product placement firms to represent its interests in Hollywood. These firms placed products and tobacco signage in positive situations that would encourage viewers to use tobacco and kept brands from being used in negative situations. At least one of the companies, RJR, undertook an extensive campaign to hook Hollywood on tobacco by providing free cigarettes to actors on a monthly basis. Efforts were also made to place favourable articles relating to product use by actors in national print media and to encourage professional photographers to take pictures of actors smoking specific brands. The cigar industry started developing connections with the entertainment industry beginning in the 1980s and paid product placements were made in both movies and on television. This effort did not always require money payments from the tobacco industry to the entertainment industry, suggesting that simply looking for cash payoffs may miss other important ties between the tobacco and entertainment industries. CONCLUSIONS: The tobacco industry understood the value of placing and encouraging tobacco use in films, and how to do it. While the industry claims to have ended this practice, smoking in motion pictures increased throughout the 1990s and remains a public health problem.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 146 citations exist upstream.

References

1971Letter to J ….1996The Cigarette Papers 2001A Comparison of Health Communication Models: Risk Learning Versus Stereotype Priming

Cited by

2012Fame Attack 2008Tobacco industry issues management organizations: Creating a global corporate network to undermine public health 2012Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid: Table 1 2009Non-student consumer attitudes towards product placement 2004How Philip Morris unlocked the Japanese cigarette market: lessons for global tobacco control 2008Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking 2009Tobacco 2007Gender Role Stereotyping in Advertisements on Three Radio Stations: Does Musical Genre Make a Difference?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.