SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses
6 references·1 citing·30 second hop
Getting started in research: systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2014)Getting started in research: systematic r…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Deep brain stimulation for obsessive–compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014)Deep brain stimulation for ob…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2005)Understanding systematic revi…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Offspring of parents with chronic pain (2015)Offspring of parents with chr…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health (2006)Men’s and Women’s Experience of Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of Ten Years of Comparative Studies in Clinical Samples; Part I (2015)What Are the Causes and Cures of Poor Megaproject Performance? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda (2020)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Severe Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2008)Obsessive-compulsive disorder (2009)Transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive–compulsive disorder: emerging clinical evidence and considerations for optimal montage of electrodes (2015)A Systematic Review of Evidence-based Treatment Strategies for Obsessive- compulsive Disorder Resistant to first-line Pharmacotherapy (2017)Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Towards an Individualized Approach (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. (1987)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Adverse Childhood Experiences in Mothers With Chronic Pain and Intergenerational Impact on Children (2019)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2005Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis317 cited
  • 2014Deep brain stimulation for obsessive–compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis95 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Offspring of parents with chronic pain130 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work