Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· 2012-04-20· article· 53 citationsclosed
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research
Abstract
No abstract was published for this record.
Cite this
Mona Nasser, Vivian Andrea Welch, Peter Tugwell, Erin Ueffing, Jodie Doyle, Elizabeth Waters (2012). Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.001
@article{mona2012ensuring,
title = {Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews},
author = {Nasser, Mona and Welch, Vivian Andrea and Tugwell, Peter and Ueffing, Erin and Doyle, Jodie and Waters, Elizabeth},
year = {2012},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.001}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.
References
2009Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting