SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management Decisions
13 references·16 citing·51 second hop
Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management Decisions (2013)Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Man…Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature (2012)Analyzing cause and effect in…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence‐based framework (2009)Linking reductionist science …Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management (2009)Doing more good than harm – B…Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews (2008)Using Existing Systematic Rev…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Guidelines for Systematic Rev…Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine (2006)Are review articles a reliabl…Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: Lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects (2005)Applying evidence-based pract…Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1 (2003)Evidence, hierarchies, and ty…Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action (1999)Knowing "What" to Do Is Not E…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)The Cochrane Collaboration: P…Review of systematic reviews in educational leadership and management: Methods used, topics explored and geographies covered (2024)Review of systematic reviews …What is “wildlife”? Legal definitions that matter to conservation (2023)What is “wildlife”? Legal def…What is the Price of Conservation? A Review of the Status Quo and Recommendations for Improving Cost Reporting (2022)What is the Price of Conserva…Sustainability materiality research: a systematic literature review of methods, theories and academic themes (2022)Sustainability materiality re…Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making (2021)Dynamic meta-analysis: a meth…Acting in the face of evidentiary ambiguity, bias, and absence arising from systematic reviews in applied environmental science (2021)Acting in the face of evident…The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers (2020)The CEEDER database of eviden…Patent analysis as a novel method for exploring commercial interest in wild harvested species (2020)Patent analysis as a novel me…Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options (2019)Systematic reviews of qualita…Engaging environmental policy-makers with systematic reviews: challenges, solutions and lessons learned (2019)Engaging environmental policy…An Exploration of Systematic Review Publication Trends in Conservation Biology Journals (2019)An Exploration of Systematic …Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions: A guide for decision makers and scientists (2017)Simplifying the selection of …Considering cost alongside the effectiveness of management in evidence-based conservation: A systematic reporting protocol (2017)Considering cost alongside th…Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis (2016)Weaving common threads in env…Maximizing the value of systematic reviews in ecology when data or resources are limited (2014)Maximizing the value of syste…Evidence‐based vegetation management: prospects and challenges (2014)Evidence‐based vegetation man…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best- run companies (1983)If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices (1998)The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation (1998)Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management (2002)Alliance Capability as a Mediator Between Experience and Alliance Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the Alliance Capability Development Process* (2006)Making sense of sensemaking narratives (2008)Monitoring and Evaluation in Conservation: a Review of Trends and Approaches (2005)Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology (2014)Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence (2018)Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (1991)The reliability of evidence review methodology in environmental science and conservation (2016)Evidence‐based restoration in the Anthropocene—from acting with purpose to acting for impact (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review (2009)Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: A systematic review (2018)Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review (2020)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011)A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) (2015)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 2006Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management1,136 cited
  • 1993The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care562 cited
  • 2003Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1540 cited
  • 1999Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action438 cited
  • 2009Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management297 cited
  • 2008Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews144 cited
  • 2006Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine136 cited
  • 2005Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: Lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects123 cited
  • 2012Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature113 cited
  • 2009Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence‐based framework104 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2022Sustainability materiality research: a systematic literature review of methods, theories and academic themes81 cited
  • 2017Considering cost alongside the effectiveness of management in evidence-based conservation: A systematic reporting protocol74 cited
  • 2017Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions: A guide for decision makers and scientists63 cited
  • 2022What is the Price of Conservation? A Review of the Status Quo and Recommendations for Improving Cost Reporting60 cited
  • 2019Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options58 cited
  • 2021Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making47 cited
  • 2023What is “wildlife”? Legal definitions that matter to conservation30 cited
  • 2019Engaging environmental policy-makers with systematic reviews: challenges, solutions and lessons learned29 cited
  • 2014Maximizing the value of systematic reviews in ecology when data or resources are limited27 cited
  • 2020The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers25 cited
  • 2016Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis22 cited
  • 2024Review of systematic reviews in educational leadership and management: Methods used, topics explored and geographies covered19 cited
  • 2020Patent analysis as a novel method for exploring commercial interest in wild harvested species13 cited
  • 2014Evidence‐based vegetation management: prospects and challenges12 cited
  • 2021Acting in the face of evidentiary ambiguity, bias, and absence arising from systematic reviews in applied environmental science12 cited
  • 2019An Exploration of Systematic Review Publication Trends in Conservation Biology Journals11 cited