SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
12 references·7 citing·43 second hop
The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. (1995)The role of the manuscript reviewer in th…The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)The Effects of Blinding on Ac…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? (1994)Is there gender bias in JAMA'…Evaluating Peer Reviews (1994)Evaluating Peer ReviewsA Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer Review (1994)A Citation Analysis of the Im…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it? (1990)Peer review in scientific jou…How Good is Peer Review? (1989)How Good is Peer Review?The Poor Quality of Early Evaluations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (1988)The Poor Quality of Early Eva…Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)Guarding the Guardians: A Con…Reviewer Status and Review Quality (1985)Reviewer Status and Review Qu…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship (2016)Expanding Group Peer Review: …Reviewing Manuscripts for Biomedical Journals (2010)Reviewing Manuscripts for Bio…El perfil de los evaluadores de una publicación médica en relación a la respuesta (2010)El perfil de los evaluadores …Is Peer Review Censorship? (2009)Is Peer Review Censorship?Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers (2008)Successful Authors and Effect…La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas (2001)La revisión por pares en las …Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews? (1999)Does exchanging comments of I…Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals (1983)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now? (1991)An economic analysis of the use of citations in the law (2000)Mixed Methods Research in Strategic Management (2010)The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review (2018)Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1993)Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medical Testimony (2002)Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? (2003)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Evidence for the effectiveness of peer review (1997)El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): muchos problemas y pocas soluciones (2002)Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers (2010)The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research (1984)The Introduction and Evaluation of MRI in Japan (1994)The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis and peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review (2002)A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools (2005)Journal Peer Review (1985)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Let’s make peer review scientific (2016)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The Representation of Women on the Editorial Boards of Major Medical Journals: A 35-Year Perspective (2008)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 1994The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review164 cited
  • 1986Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review154 cited
  • 1994Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?134 cited
  • 1988The Poor Quality of Early Evaluations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging129 cited
  • 1994A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer Review120 cited
  • 1985Reviewer Status and Review Quality66 cited
  • 1989How Good is Peer Review?59 cited
  • 1990Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?47 cited
  • 1994Evaluating Peer Reviews39 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers34 cited
  • 2009Is Peer Review Censorship?32 cited
  • 2016Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Reviewing Manuscripts for Biomedical Journals21 cited
  • 2001La revisión por pares en las revistas científicas15 cited
  • 1999Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?14 cited
  • 2010El perfil de los evaluadores de una publicación médica en relación a la respuesta11 cited