SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Perform a Critically Appraised Topic: Part 2, Appraise, Evaluate, Generate, and Recommend
12 references·0 citing·40 second hop
How to Perform a Critically Appraised Topic: Part 2, Appraise, Evaluate, Generate, and Recommend (2011)How to Perform a Critically Appraised Top…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test (2008)How to Use an Article About a…Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature (2004)Evidence-based radiology: how…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature (2002)Reporting of measures of accu…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListUsers' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' guides to the medical …Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Combining independent studies…A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis (1993)A bivariate approach to meta‐…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index addendum for PTSD (PSQI-A) (2008)Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier (2012)Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence (2013)Empirical Bayes Methods in Clinical Trials Meta‐Analysis (1990)Some Progress and Problems in Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials (1992)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,426 cited
  • 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature915 cited
  • 1994Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group486 cited
  • 2008How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test457 cited
  • 1993A bivariate approach to meta‐analysis328 cited
  • 2002Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature114 cited
  • 2004Evidence-based radiology: how to quickly assess the validity and strength of publications in the diagnostic radiology literature48 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work