Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years

11 references·3 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
1999'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies.189 cited
2005Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals176 cited
2010Randomized Clinical Trials Presented at the World Congress of Endourology: How Is the Quality of Reporting?23 cited
2009Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine15 cited

Cited by

2013A Quality Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials about Erectile Dysfunction12 cited
2016Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials in the International Journal of Impotence Research: quality assessment and relevant clinical impact

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited

2013Randomized Controlled Trials In Endourology: A Quality Assessment12 cited